<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Slash Dot Dash: Ruby to .NET bridge</title>
    <link>http://www.slashdotdash.net/articles/2006/02/21/ruby-to-net-bridge</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Rolling on Rails</description>
    <item>
      <title>Ruby to .NET bridge</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;John Lam has just released the second drop of his &lt;a href="http://www.iunknown.com/articles/2006/02/20/second-drop-of-rubyclr"&gt;RubyCLR bridge&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;blockquote&gt;
		&lt;p&gt;This second release of my RubyCLR bridge contains a non-trivial Windows Forms 2.0 application written entirely in Ruby.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;#8217;t yet had time to play with this, but the idea is pretty impressive. When I&amp;#8217;m using C# at work I&amp;#8217;m constantly thinking &lt;em&gt;if I were doing this in Ruby it would be so much quicker (shorter, more elegant code)&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:403ed93b9b0852606329c04251408550</guid>
      <author>ben@slashdotdash.net (Ben)</author>
      <link>http://www.slashdotdash.net/articles/2006/02/21/ruby-to-net-bridge</link>
      <category>.NET</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.slashdotdash.net/articles/trackback/9</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
